Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bowens v. Bombardier et al
as 9:2018cv01377
Defendant:
Gregory Archer, Daniel J. Bombardier, Matthew A. Lafountain and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Bowens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Koenigsmann et al
as 6:2018cv06684
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Deborah Bunning, Robert Schallinger and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald Ghaffaar McFadden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Fanelli et al
as 6:2018cv06471
Plaintiff:
InJah Unique Tafari
Defendant:
Mark Fanelli, James Carpenter, Thomas Dininny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonano v. Sheahan et al
as 6:2018cv06405
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonano
Defendant:
Michael Sheahan, Kevin L. Signor, Bart E. Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Annucci et al
as 6:2018cv06277
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
Anthony J Annucci, Kevin Bruen, Stephen Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braxton v. Bruen et al
as 9:2017cv01346
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Braxton
Defendant:
Kevin Bruen, Jeff McKoy, Joseph Belinier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abreu v. Bruen et al
as 6:2017cv06394
Plaintiff:
Carlos Abreu
Defendant:
Kevin Bruen, Nancy J. Heywood, John C. Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv00016
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Joseph Bellnier, Vernon Fonda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tafari v. Wolcott et al
as 6:2016cv06442
Plaintiff:
InJah Unique Tafari
Defendant:
Julie Wolcott, Frank Rhodes, Jackie Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Karim-Rashid v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2016cv00340
Plaintiff:
Abdul Ali Karim-Rashid
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Kevin Bruen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
