Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Monir Haffz-Yasaf v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-60023
Petitioner:
MONIR KHAN HAFFZ-YASAF
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jose Davila, et al v. USA, et al
as 12-50044
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE DAVILA and MARCELA C. DUARTE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNKNOWN AGENTS UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION, IFTIKHAR KHAN and others
Fazil Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-60317
Petitioner:
FAZIL KHAN, also known as Facil Kahn, also known as Fazil Kahn, also known as Fezil Khan, also known as Fazil Klein, also known as Sham Khan, also known as Fazil Klan, also known as Fazil Wara, also known as Fuzil D. Khan, also known as Khan Fazil, also k
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Abdul Khan, et al v. Newell Normand, Sheriff, et al
as 11-30112
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL S. KHAN and HAJERA T. KHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
NEWELL NORMAND, as successor to Harry Lee, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Jefferson Parish, TIM STIERWALD, Deputy, JOHN O'BRIEN, Deputy and others
Atif Rana v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-60539
Petitioner:
ATIF M. KHAN RANA
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Zahid Khan v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 10-20165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZAHID KHAN
Defendant - Appellee:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Muhammad Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-60635
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Sher Khan v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-60295
Petitioner:
SHER ASHAN KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mohammad Khan, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr, U S Attorney
as 09-60126
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD IRFAN KHAN and UZMA IRFAN MUHAMMAD, Uzma Irfan Khan
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Khan v. Holder
as 08-60971
Petitioner:
MUHAMMAD FARHAN HANIF KHAN
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.