Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Agha-Khan v. Wells Fargo Bank NA A US Bank et al
as 2:2016cv02928
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Defendant:
Chicago Title Company, Johnathan J Damen, Executive Trustee Services LLC and others
702) 471-7070 (fax:
Merscorp Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Agha-Khan v. Bank Of New York Mellon
as 2:2016cv02651
Plaintiff:
Salma Agha-Khan
Defendant:
Aspen Financial Services, LLC, Aspen Mortgage, Assessment Management Services and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bakhsh v. Khan et al
as 2:2015cv02168
Defendant:
Ampak Enterprises, LLC, Salim Attiya, Saima Bhatti and others
Plaintiff:
Qadir Bakhsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Bakhsh v. Khan et al
as 2:2015cv01948
Plaintiff:
Qadir Bakhsh
Defendant:
Maimoona Q Khan and Muhammad Q Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Khan v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01173
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Khalid Hasan Khan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01125
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00811
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
