Cases 41 - 50 of 669
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15591
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mosammat Shamima Khan v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv02939
Plaintiff:
Mosammat Shamima Khan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Allen et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv01895
Plaintiff:
Trent Allen, Shagoofa Khan, Adam Carpenter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khalid Khan v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
as 23-15538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KHALID N. KHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Beneficiary, AKA U.S.Bank.com, N.A. and S.A. CHALLENGER, INC.
Shaheryar Khan, et al v. Nancy CurryIn re: Shaheryar Khan, et al v. Nancy Curry
as 23-55301
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SHAHERYAR KHAN
Appellant:
SHAHERYAR KHAN
Appellee:
NANCY K. CURRY, Trustee
Khan et al v. City of Lodi, CA et al
as 2:2023cv00566
Plaintiff:
Shakir Khan, Umer Hayat, Adnan Bilal and others
Defendant:
City of Lodi, California, Mikey Hothi, The City Council of the City of Lodi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
United States of America v. Khan
as 23-480
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HALIM KHAN
Doe v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2023at00286
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Oscar R. Villafan and Farhad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. City of Stockton et al
as 2:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
City of Stockton, Oscar R. Villafan and Farhad Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
