Cases 1 - 10 of 35
GS Holistic LLC v. Vapor City and Smoke LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC and GS Holistic LLC
Defendant:
Vapor City and Smoke LLC doing business as Vapor City and Smoke and Saraj Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
GS Holistic LLC v. Smoke Net Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00377
Plaintiff:
GS Holistics, LLC and GS Holistic LLC
Defendant:
Smoke Net Inc doing business as Redmond Cigars & Tobacco and Mohammed Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
GS Holistic LLC v. Supernova NW LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
GS Holistics, LLC and GS Holistic LLC
Defendant:
Supernova NW LLC doing business as Xhale Vapor & Smoke and Abdul R Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Nh v. Nh et al
as 2:2022cv01335
Plaintiff:
Noor Ayesha Nh
Defendant:
Ahmed Hussain Nh, Nasreej Taj, Perveez Hussain Nh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nh v. Nh et al
as 2:2022cv01003
Plaintiff:
Noor Ayesha Nh
Defendant:
Ahmed Hussain Nh, Nasreej Taj, Perveez Hussain Nh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Nh v. Nh et al
as 2:2022cv01008
Plaintiff:
Noor Ayesha Nh
Defendant:
Ahmed Hussain Nh, Nasreej Taj, Perveez Hussain Nh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
