Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Terrell v. Lawton et al
as 1:2025cv02264
Plaintiff:
DuShawn Terrell
Defendant:
Michael Lawton, Morgane Haddad, Tiffani Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Grant, Jr. v. Rosenblum et al
as 1:2025cv00042
Defendant:
Kim Fox, Thomas Dart, Illinois States Attorneys Trustee's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Williams Grant, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tatum v. People of the State of Illinois, The - Cook County et al
as 1:2024cv12151
Defendant:
Gavin Quinn, Enyinnaya O. Nwagwu, Robert Holland and others
Plaintiff:
William Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Fox et al
as 1:2024cv09261
Defendant:
Kim Fox, Kwame Raoul, Office of the States Attorney and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Nathaniel Arnold, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Demus v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
James Demus
Defendant:
Alfredo Maldonado, Anthony Plaid, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Casasantos et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Mitchell B Davis
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Casasantos, Kim Fox, Darryl Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Doe, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv06390
Plaintiff:
Sergio Barron
Defendant:
David Brown, Kim Fox, Loukas Kalliantasis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Ahern et al
as 1:2022cv06296
Plaintiff:
David Martin
Defendant:
Judge Gregorey Ahern, State of Illinois, Governor JB Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
