Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Demus v. Maldonado et al
as 1:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
James Demus
Defendant:
Alfredo Maldonado, Anthony Plaid, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Casasantos et al
as 1:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
Mitchell B Davis
Defendant:
Detective Daniel Casasantos, Kim Fox, Darryl Hardy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyson v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Stefannie Dyson
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, John Doe, Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barron v. Brown et al
as 1:2022cv06390
Plaintiff:
Sergio Barron
Defendant:
David Brown, Kim Fox, Loukas Kalliantasis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Ahern et al
as 1:2022cv06296
Plaintiff:
David Martin
Defendant:
Judge Gregorey Ahern, State of Illinois, Governor JB Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Fox
as 1:2022cv05952
Plaintiff:
Flint J. Lee
Defendant:
Kim Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Milner v. Antesberger et al
as 1:2022cv03561
Plaintiff:
Anthony Milner
Defendant:
Antesberger, Huertas, Macias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hacker v. Dart et al
as 1:2022cv02653
Plaintiff:
Gerald G. Hacker, Jr.
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Cook County Sherriffs Deputies, Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Sacks et al
as 1:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Deandre Bradley
Defendant:
Stanley Sacks, State of Illinois, Kim Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. City of Chicago Illinois Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv04413
Defendant:
Kim Fox, Chicago Houseng Authority, Dorothy Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Willie James Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
