Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Vanessa Gill v. Bobby Barrett, et al
as 16-15642
Petitioner - Appellant:
VANESSA GILL
Respondent - Appellee:
BOBBY BARRETT, KIM TOBIAS THOMAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Eldridge v. Gordy et al
as 1:2014cv00282
Petitioner:
Willie Eldridge
Respondent:
Christopher Gordy, Kim Tobias Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eldridge v. Gordy, et al. (INMATE 3)
as 2:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
Willie Eldridge
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, Kim Tobias Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Weeks v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2013cv00926
Plaintiff:
Ronald Weeks
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Alabama Department of Corrections, Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gill v. Barrett et al
as 2:2013cv00514
Petitioner:
Vanessa Gill
Respondent:
Bobby Barrett, Kim Tobias Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robinson v. Cooks et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Luther Strange and Mary Cooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robinson v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00691
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gill v. Barrett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00642
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Gill
Defendant:
Bobby Barrett, Kim Tobias Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reeder v. Thomas, et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00359
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Reeder
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendrix v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Luther Strange and Leeposey Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
