Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Simmons v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00165
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Simmons
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Coyle v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00762
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Coyle
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mott v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv07305
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Mott
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12741
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Taylor
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kuhn v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02843
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Kuhn
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gorrell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01454
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Gorrell
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pridemore v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31394
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Pridemore
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28747
Plaintiff: Connie M. Martley, Judith A. Segall, Cindy Bock and others
Defendant: Covidien Inc., Covidien, LLC, Covidien plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Metts v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv27977
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Metts
Defendant: E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27365
Plaintiff: Kimberly Ann Warren
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?