Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Immanuel Sanchez v. Manuel Real, et al
as 19-56097
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEXANDER F. MACKINNON, individiual and official capacity as Magistrate Judge of the United States Central District Court of California, R. SMITH, individual and official capacity as Deputy Clerk of the United States Central District Court, CHRIS SAWYER, individual and official capacity as Deputy Clerk of the United States Central District Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IMMANUEL F. SANCHEZ
Kraft v. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06971
Defendant:
Kiry Gray, Mary E. Powell, Robert F. Schwartz and others
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kraft v. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv03036
Plaintiff:
Rune Kraft
Defendant:
Oldcastle Precast, Inc., Inland Concrete Enterprises, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Joseph C. Faucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 18-15673
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USA, et al
as 17-17401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Daniel Dydzak v. USDC-CASF
as 17-72962
:
In re: DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Petitioner:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS, MATTHEW C. ROGERS, AKA Matt Rogers and others
Dydzak v. United States of America et al
as 4:2017cv04360
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dydzak
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, Matthew C. Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Aaron Raiser v. Yevette Lois et al
as 5:2012cv00045
Defendant:
Sharon Hall Brown, Audrey B Collins, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Raiser
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
