Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Knights v. Bolton et al
as 3:2011cv00117
Plaintiff: Michael L. Knights
Defendant: Mark Bolton and Covington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al v. Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00305
Plaintiff: Yvonne Day , Leonard Haslag , James McCormick and others
Defendant: Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., Paul C. Orberson, Jeff Orberson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Knight
as 3:2010mc00032
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: Edwin F. Knight, II
USA v. Knight
as 3:2010mc00035
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: Edwin F. Knight, II
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
USA v. Knight
as 3:2010mc00034
Petitioner: USA
Respondent: Charlene B. Knight
Coach, Inc. et al v. Tiffany's on Broadway et al
as 5:2010cv00068
Plaintiff: Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc
Defendant: Tiffany's on Broadway, Phillis Knight, David Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Knight v. Kentucky Medical Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00114
Plaintiff: Leon Knight
Defendant: Kentucky Medical Facility and Dr. Growse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. K Mart Corporation
as 3:2010cv00166
Plaintiff: Beverly Knight
Defendant: K Mart Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Knight et al v. Mitek Company
as 1:2009cv00144
Plaintiff: Carl Kent Knight and Penny Knight
Defendant: Mitek Company, Mitek Company and Mitek Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Chapman v. Knight et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00092
Plaintiff: Nichole Chapman
Defendant: William Knight, Jr., Ann Melton and Adair County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?