Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Lucchese v. Kone, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00889
Defendant:
Kone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lucchese and Julio Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lucchese v. Kone, Inc.
as 4:2021cv00895
Defendant:
Kone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lucchese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv07896
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Totah et al v. Kone Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv03842
Plaintiff:
Anne-Marie Totah, Jayden Totah and Eric Totah
Defendant:
Kone Inc., ThyssenKrupp Elevator Corporation, City and County of San Francisco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J.N. et al v. Macy s Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv01222
Plaintiff:
J. N. and Diep Nguyen
Defendant:
Macy s Corporate Services, Inc., Does 1-100, Crocs, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Blackstone Group LP (NYSE: BX)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
J.N. et al v. Macy s Corporate Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv06009
Plaintiff:
Diep Nguyen, Jerry Nguyen and J. N.
Defendant:
Macy's West Stores, Inc., Crocs, Inc., Macy's Corporate Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Preston et al v. Chula Vista Center, LP et al
as 3:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Emmenle D. Preston, JR. and Majel Williams
Defendant:
Chula Vista Center, LP , Rouse Properties, LLC , Kone Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ada Nohemy Ortega v. Kohls Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv08056
Defendant:
Does, Kohls Department Stores, Inc. and Kone, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ada Nohemy Ortega
Helm v. Kone, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv02516
Plaintiff:
Michael Helm
Defendant:
Kone, Inc. and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rivera Jr. v. Kone, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rivera Jr.
Defendant:
Kone, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
