Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Correos v. Western Progressive - Nevada - Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00593
Plaintiff:
Harold S Correos
Defendant:
Western Progressive - Nevada - Inc., Nevada Legal News, Home Means Nevada Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Pajarillo v. Schuler-Hintz et al
as 2:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Fidel H. Pajarillo
Defendant:
Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz, Michael Chen, U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Michael F. Sullivan v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2013cv00055
Defendant:
Quality Loan Servicing Corporation, Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Michael F. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Macera v. Marix Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00797
Defendant:
CR Title Services, Inc., CTX Mortgage Company LLC, CitiMortgage Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Macera
Unknown:
Patrick G. Byrne, Kristin A Schuler-Hintz and Erica J Stutman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Default
B. Spain v. EMC Mortage Corporation, et al
as 10-17559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
B. SPAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
EMC MORTAGE CORPORATION, Affecting Interstate Commerce, RALENE RUYLE, CEO of EMC Mortgage Co., BEVERLY SIBBLIES, Director of EMC and others
Farren v. Schuler-Hintz et al
as 2:2009cv01693
Plaintiff:
Jonanthan K. Farren
Defendant:
Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz, Quality Loan Service Corporation, Jay Earl Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ormand v. Netzorg et al
as 2:2009cv01169
Plaintiff:
John Ormand
Defendant:
John M. Netzorg, Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz, Eva Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Spain v. EMC Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2007cv00308
Plaintiff:
B Spain
Defendant:
EMC Mortgage Company, Ralene Ruyle, Ralene Ruyle and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
