Cases 1 - 10 of 409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01993
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act
The Kroger Co. v. Marten Transport Services, Ltd.
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
The Kroger Co.
Defendant:
Marten Transport Services, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Doe v. The Kroger Co.
as 1:2023cv00741
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Lee County, AL et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al.
as 1:2023op45010
Plaintiff:
Lee County, AL and Winston County, AL
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Alvogen Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03460
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS et al v. THE KROGER CO. et al
as 1:2023op45009
Plaintiff:
JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS, SANDOVAL COUNTY, NEW MEXICO, COOS COUNTY, OREGON and others
Defendant:
THE KROGER CO., KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I and KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
