Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stepherson v. Haaland
as 22-2936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Anthony Stepherson, Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, a Noble, a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propia Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae, DBA Jamal El Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
Anthony John Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, DBA Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Marshall Saul and others
Stepherson v. Haaland et al
as 1:2022cv09202
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Stepherson Moor beneficiary, a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in Propia Persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae doing business as Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Debra Anne Haaland doing business as Debra Anne Haaland, Andrew Marshall Saul, Brian Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Timothy Littlejohn v. Chief Judge, Superior Court of Fulton County, et al
as 22-11443
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE LITTLEJOHN
Defendant / Appellee:
CHIEF JUDGE, Superior Court of Fulton County, THE HONORABLE CHRISTOPHER S. BRASHER, Chief Judge, Superior Court of Fulton County, CATHELENE TINA ROBINSON and others
Kurt Smith v. Joseph Meko
as 16-5630
Petitioner - Appellant:
KURT ROBERT SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
JOSEPH P. MEKO, Warden, Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Smith v. Meko
as 5:2015cv00252
Petitioner:
Kurt Robert Smith
Respondent:
Joseph Meko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ismael Estrada v. Ronald Gooden, et al
as 15-10338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISMAEL ESTRADA
Defendant - Appellee:
RONALD D. GOODEN, KURT ROBERT ERSKINE, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES and others
Kurt Smith v. Cookie Crew
as 14-5994
Petitioner - Appellant:
KURT ROBERT SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
COOKIE CREWS, Warden, Kentucky State Reformatory
Smith v. Crews
as 5:2010cv00091
Petitioner:
Kurt Robert Smith
Respondent:
Cookie Crews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
