Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Kurtz v. 3M Company
as 1:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Erich D Kurtz
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schwarzer v. Hernandez et al
as 6:2019cv00016
Defendant:
Luis Hernandez, Chesley Williams, Evelyn Castro and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Cliff Schwarzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrillo v. Castro
as 6:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Timothy Carrillo
Defendant:
Warden E. Castro and Captain Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtz v. Davis
as 5:2018cv00062
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Christopher Arthur Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Claudia Ocoro, et.al. vs. Armando Montelongo, Jr., et.al.
as 5:2016cv01278
Plaintiff:
Claudia Ocoro, Kassa Eden, Jemila Weldenhawayat and others
Defendant:
Armando Montelongo, Jr, Armando Montelongo, Jr., Real Estate Training International, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cruz v. Kurtz et al
as 4:2016cv01270
Petitioner:
Alberto C Cruz, Jr
Respondent:
Ross M Kurtz, Wharton County Sheriff Office and Edith Thounsguard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kurtz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Barbara Kurtz , Susan Brown , Carol Kiel and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kraft et al v. Ethicon Inc
as 3:2014cv03467
Plaintiff:
Rose Kraft , Sandra Huss , Kim Hampton and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurtz v. Holder
as 5:2014cv00412
Respondent:
Sheriff Bob Holder
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Kurtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chavez v. Montogmery County et al
as 4:2013cv01919
Petitioner:
Jacob Chavez
Respondent:
Montogmery County, Sheriff Tommy Gage, Sr. Sgt. Kurtz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
