Cases 1 - 10 of 357
Williams v. Gillis
as 1:2024cv00501
Petitioner:
Antonio L. Williams
Respondent:
Shawn Gillis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Phillepe et al
as 8:2023cv02162
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Williams
Defendant:
Mattey Phillepe, Sara B. Mallo and Bob Gualtieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Platero et al
as 5:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
Maurice L Williams
Defendant:
B Platero, FNU Morey, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WILLIAMS v. DIXON
as 1:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
CARLTON L WILLIAMS, SR
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILLIAMS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
JAMAR L WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, AARON MARTINEZ and MTC/GRACEVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. DIXON
as 4:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
DETRAIL L WILLIAMS
Respondent:
RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Rolon et al
as 1:2022cv24043
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Williams
Defendant:
Rolon, W. Perez, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2022cv23766
Plaintiff:
Chey L. Williams
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Rolon et al
as 1:2022cv22683
Plaintiff:
Larry L. Williams
Defendant:
Rolon, W. Perez, Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. NEAL et al
as 3:2022cv16791
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY L WILLIAMS, JR
Defendant:
NEAL, C NEELY, R DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
