Cases 1 - 10 of 555
Higgins et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Alyce L Higgins and Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Munden et al v. Bannock County
as 4:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dennis L Munden, Sherrilyn L Munden and Coyote Creek Ranch, LLC
Defendant:
Bannock County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bartholomew v. Kralik, et al.
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Darin L. Bartholomew
Defendant:
Dusty Kralik, Shane Grady, Todd McDevitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wayment v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
SHARON L. WAYMENT
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Tijerina v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Jessica-Ann Tijerina
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Jared Smith, Byron Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jacobs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Randall L. Jacobs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Qualman v. Thorne
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Treg Qualman
Defendant:
Jodi L. Thorne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Winkler, et al. v. Payne, et al.
as 3:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michelle Kirby Winkler, Yvonne Kay Peterson, Jeremy Carroll Akdison and others
Defendant:
Jeff P. Payne, Kathy M. Ackerman, Nikki Sickels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carpentier v. State of Idaho
as 1:2023cv00535
Petitioner:
Alfred L. Carpentier
Respondent:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
