Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HALE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68453
Plaintiff:
JOHN L HALE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HALE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10831
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL L HALE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv00162
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY L HALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALE v. INCH
as 3:2020cv05825
Respondent:
MARK S INCH
Petitioner:
NORMOND L. HALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale et al v. Seminole Hard Rock International LLC et al
as 8:2019cv02803
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Seminole Hard Rock International LLC and Seminole Hard Rock International LLC doing business as Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Tampa
Plaintiff:
Does 1 through 5 and April L. Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SANTIAGO v. SHULKIN et al.
as 3:2017cv00388
Plaintiff:
WIDALYS SANTIAGO
Defendant:
DAVID J SHULKIN, TUANA DIEP, ANNETTE M ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Alvarez et al v. General Electric Company
as 0:2013cv62333
Plaintiff:
Rolando Alvarez , Lance Bergmann , Fernandez S Austin and others
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Hale v. United States of America
as 5:2012cv00395
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Hale
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
