Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Harrris et al
as 2:2022cv00660
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Aaron L Harrris, Sr., Tah'Jae Ray, Aaron L Harris, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Harris et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2017cv02168
Plaintiff:
Eugene Harris, III and Connie L. Harris
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., National Default Servicing Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Harris v. USA
as 2:2016cv01224
Petitioner:
David L. Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Harris v. LeGrand et al
as 3:2015cv00471
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Harris
Respondent:
Robert LeGrand and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Legarnde et al
as 3:2012cv00042
Petitioner:
Gregory L. Harris
Respondent:
Robert Legarnde and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moulton v. Kern
as 3:2011cv00087
Defendant:
Ulla Christsensen, John R. Coleman, Raymond Corrigan and others
Counter Claimant:
Gayle A. Kern and Gayle A. Kern, LTD
Counter Defendant:
Sheryl Moulton
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Moulton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moulton v. Kern et al
as 2:2010cv02264
Defendant:
Ulla Christensen, John R. Coleman, John R Colman and others
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Moulton
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00337
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
