Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Saunders v. Diamond Pharmacy Services et al
as 3:2022cv01924
Plaintiff:
Antonio Saunders
Defendant:
Diamond Pharmacy Services, Lupin Pharm. Corp, Novartis Pharm. Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01485
Defendant:
PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC, KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V and others
Plaintiff:
David L Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY et al v. ROYAL SOVEREIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
as 3:2021cv00052
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, BRIAN J. MARTIN and TINA L. MARTIN
Defendant:
ROYAL SOVEREIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Martin v. American Airlines, Inc., et al.
as 2:2021cv01167
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES INC., DOES 1 THROUGH 10 and AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
Kelly L Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas v. Ransom et al
as 1:2020cv02405
Defendant:
Sgt. Conrad, T. Austin, L. Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Shekir Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06160
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. MARTIN and JUDY J. MARTIN
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARTIN v. WARDEN OF F.C.I. MCKEAN-CAMP
as 1:2018cv00358
Defendant:
WARDEN OF MCKEAN FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner:
JESSIE L. MARTIN, JR.
Respondent:
WARDEN OF F.C.I. MCKEAN-CAMP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARTIN v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2018cv00269
Petitioner:
JESSIE L. MARTIN
Respondent:
MARK WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
