Cases 1 - 3 of 3
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al
as 22-2066
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P. P. and R. P.
Defendant / Appellee:
L. NAGANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Owner of Naga Law Firm, NAGA LAW FIRM, J. RAMYA and others
Defendant:
JUDGE BARRY T. ALBIN, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE ATLANTIC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP AND MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE CRAIG CORSON, individually and in her official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ and others
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al
as 21-2560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P. P. and R. P.
Defendant / Appellee:
L. NAGANDA, individually and in his official capacity as Owner of Naga Law Firm, NAGA LAW FIRM, J. RAMYA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTICE STUART RABNER, individually and in his official capacity as Chief Justice of Supreme Court of NJ
Defendant:
ALLISON E. ACCURSO, BARRY T. ALBIN, CRAIG CORSON and others
Palani Karupaiyan, et al v. L. Naganda, et al
as 21-1813
Defendant / Appellee:
ATLANTIC REALTY DEVELOPMENT CORP AND MIDDLESEX MANAGEMENT, JUSTICE WALTER F. TIMPONE, individually and in his official capacity as Justice of Supreme Court of N, JUDGE JERALD COUNCIL, individually and in his official capacity as Judges of the Superior Court, Middlesex County, NJ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Plaintiff:
P. P. and R. P.
Defendant:
JUDGE ALLISON E. ACCURSO, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE JOSEPH L. YANNOTTI, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ, JUDGE TOWNSHIP OF EDISON, individually and in his official capacity as Judge of Appellate Division of NJ and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
