Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Smith v. Hepp et al
as 2:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Defendant:
Randall Hepp and Waupun Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Walworth County Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00819
Plaintiff:
Elton L Smith
Defendant:
Walworth County Jail, Kevin Knaus, Steven Sax and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White Hair Solutions LLC v. Gideon Capital Investments & Management LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00717
Plaintiff:
White Hair Solutions LLC
Defendant:
Gideon Capital Investments & Management LLC, Diego Aizcorbe, Chuck Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smith v. Brockway et al
as 1:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Charles L Smith
Defendant:
K9 Officer Brockway, Nicholas Hellend and Officer Kudinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Keith et al v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of Minnesota
as 3:2022cv00618
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Smith and Britta L. Smith
Defendant:
Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Smith v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Kenyada L Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith, Kari v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kari L Smith and Kari L. Smith
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. Fuchs et al
as 2:2021cv01313
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Defendant:
Warden Fuchs and Columbia Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fuchs et al
as 2:2020cv01485
Defendant:
John Does, Mr Glass and Larry Fuchs
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Foster et al
as 2:2018cv01904
Defendant:
Beiler, Tony Meli, Birdsaw and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
