Prisoner Petitions Cases
SEARCY v. BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff: DAVID LEE SEARCY
Defendant: BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED, TOMMY FORD, RICK ANGLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dooley v. Troyer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00202
Plaintiff: Dorris L Y Dooley
Defendant: Michelle Troyer, Callie Daniels and Elkhart County Superior Court 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01619
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01620
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01618
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01324
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DOOLEY v. SUPERINTENDENT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01087
Petitioner: DORRIS L Y DOOLEY
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dooley v. Superintendent
as 1:2017cv00121
Petitioner: Dorris L Y Dooley
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dooley v. Superintendent We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00117
Petitioner: Dorris L Y Dooley
Respondent: Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?