Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03521
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
United States of America v. Branford
as 20-2743
Defendant:
Everda Baron, Arron Gunn, AKA Sealed Defendant #10, AKA Texas, AKA Steven Dunn, Heather LaFave and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jermaine Branford, AKA Sealed Defendant # 1, AKA Hovie
Kendrick v. Troche
as 19-3076
Defendant / Appellee:
Jason Vaughn, Sandra Doorley, Rochester Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Dean Kendrick
LaFaver v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00788
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Samantha Marie LaFaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kendrick v. Troche et al
as 6:2018cv06932
Defendant:
Jason Vaughn, Sandra Doorley, Rochester Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
James Dean Kendrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LaFave v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Lee Ann LaFave
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LaFave v. USA
as 5:2014cv00508
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Heather LaFave
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Branford
as 12-4367
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Enal C. LaRose, AKA Sealed Defendant # 2, AKA EZ, Tyrone Felder, AKA Sealed Defendant # 3, AKA T-Bone, Travis Battice and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jermaine Branford, AKA Sealed Defendant # 1, AKA Hovie
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
