Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Lamont v. Gold Coast Casino
as 2:2024cv01068
Plaintiff:
Johnson Lamont
Defendant:
Gold Coast Casino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Oliver et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Petitioner:
James Lamont Moore
Respondent:
Warden Oliver and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McCoy v. USA
as 2:2024cv00759
Petitioner:
Darren Lamont McCoy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. Fraker et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
Katie Fraker and Nathanjah Breitenbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Washoe County Sheriffs Detention Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Lamont Roberts
Defendant:
Washoe County Sheriffs Detention Facility and Naphcare Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mitchell v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 2:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, Charles Daniels, Michael Minev and others
Interested Party:
Office of the Attorney General (Nevada)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. High Desert State Prison et al
as 3:2022cv00067
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Defendant:
High Desert State Prison, Charles Daniels, Michael Minev and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Donnelly et al
as 3:2020cv00645
Defendant:
Melissa Hughes, Rusty Donnelly, Brian Egerton and others
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Lamont Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Gittere et al
as 3:2020cv00587
Petitioner:
Keonis Lamont Davis
Respondent:
William Gittere and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
