Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Davis v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2024cv01181
Defendant:
Milwaukee Sheriff Department, Milwaukee Police Department, City of Milwaukee and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lamont Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chappell v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv01098
Respondent:
Warden Cheryl Eplett
Petitioner:
Lamont L Chappell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Virgil v. DeYoung et al
as 2:2024cv00973
Defendant:
Shelrie Wilson, R Frias, C Hinz and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lamont Virgil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00788
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lamont Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
Lamont D Walker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stallings v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Lamont Stallings
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Davis, Lamont v. Menard, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Lamont D. Davis
Defendant:
Menard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ealy v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01650
Plaintiff:
Lamonte A Ealy
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01518
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gillespie v. Noble
as 1:2023cv00921
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamont Gillespie
Defendant:
Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
