Cases 1 - 4 of 4
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant:
WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant:
WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff:
KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant:
WALTER L. WEISMAN
Parich et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc et al
as 1:2014cv10221
Plaintiff:
Lari Parich , Christopher Parich and Sunny Jefferson
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc, Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
