Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Toolasprashad v. Holder, et al
as 1:2013cv00882
Plaintiff:
Latchmie Toolasprashad
Defendant:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., SECRETARY OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and Walter M. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOOLASPRASHAD v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2013cv01197
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., SECRETARY OF IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and WALTER M. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00713
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Toolasprashad v. Tryon et al
as 1:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Latchmie Toolasprashad
Defendant:
Todd Tryon, Michael Phillips, Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00734
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Toolasprashad v. Tryon et al
as 1:2012cv00014
Petitioner:
Latchmie Toolasprashad
Respondent:
Todd L. Tryon and Barbosa-Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00840
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00696
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TOOLASPRASHAD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv05335
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KATHLEEN M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
TOOLASPRASHAD v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2009cv00317
Plaintiff:
LATCHMIE TOOLASPRASHAD
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, KATHLEEN M. KENNEY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
