Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, et al. v. Biden, et al.
as 24-2533
Plaintiff: ALASKA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AND EXPORT AUTHORITY, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH, ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION and others
Intervenor: STATE OF ALASKA, NATIVE VILLAGE OF VENETIE TRIBAL GOVERNMENT, VENETIE VILLAGE COUNCIL and others
Defendant: JOSEPH R. BIDEN, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Interior and others
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. J.R. Simplot Company, et al
as 23-35544
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. USDOI, et al
as 23-35543
Plaintiff / Appellee: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. J.R. Simplot Company, et al
as 23-80059
Respondent: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION, LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Not Yet Classified: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Reservati v. USDOI, et al
as 23-80058
Respondent: SHOSHONE-BANNOCK TRIBES OF THE FORT HALL RESERVATION
Petitioner: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT and LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management
Not Yet Classified: J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY
Orutsararmiut Native Council et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff: Orutsararmiut Native Council, Tuluksak Native Community and Organized Village of Kwethluk
Defendant: United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Bureau of Land Management, United States Department of Interior and others
Intervenor Defendant: Donlin Gold LLC
Petitioner: Calista Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Cook Inletkeeper et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff: Cook Inletkeeper, Alaska Community Action on Toxics, Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Amanda Lefton and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Alaska v. Debra Haaland, et al
as 22-35376
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF ALASKA
Defendant / Appellee: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Department of the Interior, LAURA DANIEL-DAVIS, Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land and Minerals Management, Bureau of Land Management, CHAD PADGETT, Alaska State Director, Bureau of Land Management and others
Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority v. Biden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00245
Plaintiff: Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority, North Slope Borough and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States Department of Interior, Deb Halland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of Alaska v. Haaland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00158
Plaintiff: State of Alaska
Defendant: Deb Haaland, Laura Daniel-Davis, Chad Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?