Cases 41 - 50 of 71
Mueller v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2008cv00035
Plaintiff:
Randy Mueller
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly, James Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dedeaux v. State of Mississippi et al
as 4:2008cv00031
Plaintiff:
Abel J. Dedeaux
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Lawrence Kelly, James Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crosby v. Kelly et al
as 4:2007cv00119
Plaintiff:
Allucius Crosby
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly, "Unknown" Kim, Dzandra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGruder v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jerry McGruder
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00187
Plaintiff:
Solomon S. Kennedy
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Lawrence Kelly, James Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Farris v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Farris
Defendant:
E. L. Sparkman, Lynette Jordan, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Epps, et al
as 07-60955
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LATRELL ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, MDOC Commissioner, LAWRENCE KELLY, MSP Superintendent and DARLESTER FOSTER, Deputy Warden
Handy v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
Willie Handy
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lawrence Kelly, Yvonne Battle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carrothers v. Kelly, et al
as 07-60883
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARCO CARROTHERS
Defendant - Appellee:
LAWRENCE KELLY, Superintendent, STANLEY FLAGG, Associate Warden, RICKY SCOTT, Internal Audit Division and others
Jackson v. Epps et al
as 4:2007cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jackson
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Emmit Sparkman, Lawrence Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
