Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stephen Yagman v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2012cv10104
Defendant:
David Benson, Patricia E Black, Pascal Boillat and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Yagman
Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Frederic Malek
as 07-7108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corporation Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association, Wayne County Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association and Federal Housing Finance Agency, Derivatively on Behalf of Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant - Appellee:
Franklin D. Raines, Timothy Howard, Daniel H. Mudd and others
KELLMER v. RAINES et al
as 1:2007cv01173
Plaintiff:
JAMES KELLMER
Defendant:
FRANKLIN D. RAINES, J. TIMOTHY HOWARD, LEANNE SPENCER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 j(b) Stockholder Suit
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 05-5369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
IN RE: FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION SECURITIES, DERIVATIVE & "ERISA" LITIGATION
as 1:2005mc00234
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BADER, VINCENT VINCI, VINCENT VINCI and others
Defendant:
FRANKLIN D. RAINES, FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, TIMOTHY HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 02-5261
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2001cv00725
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 00-5256
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
