Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Lawson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
Laramie Lawson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Lawson v. Aramark Correctional Services LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03985
Defendant:
Lt. David Sandridge, Aramark Correctional Services LLC, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip A. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sauerwein v. City of Toledo et al
as 3:2023cv01071
Plaintiff:
Gloria Sauerwein
Defendant:
City of Toledo, Officer Burton, Officer Meier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. Erdos et al
as 1:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Antonio Taylor
Defendant:
Ron Erdos, Leslie Mahlman, Lauder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wormald v. Bracy et al
as 1:2022cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ashley Wormald
Defendant:
Warden Charmaine Bracy, Warden LaShann Eppinger, Brandon Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lanier v. Lawson et al
as 1:2020cv00770
Plaintiff:
Leonard Lanier
Defendant:
Lt. R. Osbourne, Gary Lawson and Linnea Mahlman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. USA
as 1:2019cv02036
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Robert K. Lawson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Finley v. Murphy et al
as 2:2019cv01449
Defendant:
Nurse Tim Cowgill, Nurse Young, Joseph Murphy and others
Plaintiff:
Ray L. Finley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00086
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Warden Bowermen and Gary Mohr
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv00087
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, Director Gary Mohr and Warden Bowermen
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
