Cases 1 - 10 of 20
WARREN v. CIA et al
as 1:2015cv01473
Plaintiff:
ANDREW WARREN
Defendant:
CIA and LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
SALEM BIN ALI JABER et al v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
AHMED SALEM BIN ALI JABER and ESAM ABDULLAH ABDULMAHMOUD BIN ALI JABER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, LEON PANETTA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
CARTER v. BUSH et al
as 1:2015cv00778
Plaintiff:
AUDREY TAYLOR CARTER
Defendant:
GEORGE BUSH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2013cv01041
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE, CONDOLEEZZA RICE, HILLARY R. CLINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VAUGHN et al v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2013cv00974
Plaintiff:
BILLY VAUGHN , CHARLES STRANGE , DOUG HAMBURGER and others
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., LEON PANETTA, HAMID KARZAI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BAASCH v. PANETTA
as 1:2013cv00674
Petitioner:
MARTIN BAASCH
Respondent:
LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DURY v. PANETTA
as 1:2013cv00335
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JAMES DURY
Defendant:
LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00232
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
DOE v. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
CIACCI v. PANETTA
as 1:2012cv01997
Petitioner:
MICHAEL K. CIACCI
Respondent:
LEON PANETTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
