Cases 41 - 50 of 536
Mock et al v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
William T Mock, Christopher Lewis, Firearms Policy Coalition Inc and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Lewis
as 2:2023cv00172
Plaintiff:
United States and United States of America
Defendant:
Khiara Lewis
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Lewis-Watson v. Wormuth et al
as 5:2022cv01289
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lewis-Watson
Defendant:
Christine E. Wormuth, John F. Bash, Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chavez, et al
as 2:2022mc04512
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Mauricio Chavez and CBT Group LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Giorgio Benvenuto, CryptoFX, LLC and John Lewis, Jr
Receiver:
John Lewis, Jr.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chavez et al
as 3:2022xc02390
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Mauricio Chavez, Giorgio Benvenuto, CryptoFX, LLC and others
Receiver:
John Lewis, Jr. and John Lewis, Jr
USA v. Hurst
as 22-20544
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lewis Gilmore Hurst
USA v. Lewis
as 22-20547
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
William Solomon Lewis
Burkhart v. University Interscholastic League (UIL) et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Jerry burkhart
Defendant:
University Interscholastic League (UIL), Michael motheral, Arturo Rodriguez Cavazos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
