Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Marcum v. Lewis
as 3:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Alex Marcum
Defendant:
Lincoln Steven Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Secherest et al v. City of Lexington et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Leroy Secherest, Damion Levy, Tyqwon Walden and others
Defendant:
City of Lexington, Robin McRory, Charles Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Washington County, Mississippi et al.
as 4:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lewis
Defendant:
Washington County, Mississippi, Washington County Public Defender Office, Attorney Marvin Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Southaven, Mississippi et al
as 3:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lewis
Defendant:
City of Southaven, Mississippi and Detective Whitney Walley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. Floyd et al
as 3:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Paul Lewis
Defendant:
Donna Floyd and Young Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. City of Tupelo et al
as 1:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Willie Lewis
Defendant:
City of Tupelo, Dustin Tutor, Sam Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
