Cases 21 - 30 of 539
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05632
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lewis
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Champion Mortgage Company, Ros Borikin LLC, Mark I. Partnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lewis v. The City of New York
as 1:2023cv05822
Plaintiff:
Robert Lewis
Defendant:
The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 1:2023cv05412
Plaintiff:
Patricia Lewis
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Champion Mortgage Company, Ros Borikin LLC, Mark I. Partnow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-902
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.