Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Li et al v. Lewis
as 1:2020cv00012
Plaintiff:
You Li, Roland Li, Larry Lewis and others
Interpleader:
Internal Revenue Service and USA
Defendant:
Jack Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Nudge LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00867
Defendant:
Phillip W. Smith, Response Marketing Group, Ryan C. Poelman and others
Plaintiff:
Utah Division of Consumer Protection and Federal Trade Commission
Intervenor:
Erryl Sloan, American Estate and Trust DBO Erryl Sloan IRA and American Estate and Trust FBO Rosemary Sloan IRA
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Rosemary Sloan and E&R Enterprise
Petitioner:
Just Us Realtors and Sean D. Reyes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00828
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Klein v. Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv00801
Plaintiff:
R. Wayne Klein
Defendant:
Lewis Initiatives and Natalyn Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Lewis v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00104
Not Yet Classified:
SSA Notice
Plaintiff:
Dara L. Lewis
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00589
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
M. et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona
as 2:2018cv00922
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona
Plaintiff:
Shay M. and Lewis M.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Guymon v. Litsey
as 2:2018cv00850
Defendant:
Douglas Scott Litsey
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Guymon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
