Cases 21 - 30 of 313
AFKHAMI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv02818
Plaintiff:
ALI AFKHAMI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ELROY LEWIS DENNIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
BROWN v. PRIETO
as 1:2022cv02359
Plaintiff:
LEWIS ROSS BROWN
Defendant:
JEFFREY PRIETO
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
LEWIS v. KELLY et al
as 1:2022cv02202
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE O. LEWIS
Defendant:
ROBERT N. KELLY and JACKSON & CAMPBELL, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MOSES v. NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv01813
Plaintiff:
Mr. Marcus Lewis Moses
Defendant:
NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as NEIGHBORWORKS AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01797
Petitioner:
KEYION M. LEWIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, BOBBY LUMPKIN, JR., MICHAEL BRITT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. BURMANIA et al
as 1:2022cv01708
Plaintiff:
LEWIS ROSS BROWN
Defendant:
TESSA L. BURMANIA, SUJATHA SANKULA and MARIETTA ECHEVERRIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEWIS v. MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
as 1:2022cv00520
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. LEWIS
Defendant:
MAYOR(S) OF WASHINGTON, DC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILLIAMS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, NYASHA SMITH, PHIL MENDELSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
