Cases 21 - 30 of 335
Lewis v. Winkler et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lewis
Defendant:
Judge Ralph E. Winkler and Magistrate Karen Rosen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv00144
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Krista K. Lewis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ricketts v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv01711
Plaintiff:
Donat Ricketts and Donat Ricketts, Jr
Defendant:
Adrian Deonte Smith, Michael Braggs, Jacqueline Suzette Wright Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lewis et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv01449
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lewis and Prentice Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
Troree Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc, Davol and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carroll v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Richard Lewis Carroll
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lewis et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00531
Plaintiff:
Edward Lewis and Lewis C. Frances
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lewis v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McComb v. Best Buy Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert S. McComb
Defendant:
Best Buy Inc., Annah Jane Doe, Dorian John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Buckles v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
LEWIS M. BUCKLES
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
