Cases 51 - 60 of 314
WILLIAMS et al v. WALSH et al
as 1:2021cv01150
Defendant:
MARTIN J. WALSH, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN JOHNSON, JR., MARY JANE WILLIAMS, MARY HESTER LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
BROWN et al v. SANKULA
as 1:2021cv00966
Plaintiff:
LEWIS ROSS BROWN and LEWIS ROSS BROWN, IV
Defendant:
SUJATHA SANKULA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. FARRUGGIA et al
as 1:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
LEWIS ROSS BROWN
Defendant:
FRANK T. FARRUGGIA, TESSA BURMANIA, MARIETTA ELENA ECHEVERRIA-BURKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AMERICAN FOREST RESOURCE COUNCIL et al v. Williams et al
as 1:2021cv00601
Defendant:
SCOTT DE LA VEGA, Martha Williams and DEBRA HAALAND
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS COUNTY, OREGON, LEWIS COUNTY, SKAMANIA COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
LEWIS v. BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv00415
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03608
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LEWIS v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2020cv03372
Plaintiff:
PENNEY LEWIS
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LEWIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2020cv03276
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
YVETTE K. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
