Cases 1 - 10 of 889
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Lewis v. Home Depot, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2024cv00955
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lewis
Defendant:
Home Depot, Inc. and Doe Contractor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
(PC) Lewis v. Warden et al
as 2:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Chauncey T. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden and Dr. Farhat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lewis v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Chauncey T. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden and Dr. Farhat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Lewis v. Synchrony Bank
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Jon Lewis
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02927
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Lewis v. Phillip et al
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Paul Dixon Lewis
Defendant:
B. Phillip, J. Salinas and V. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at01277
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Res-care, Inc.
as 2:2023cv02898
Defendant:
Res-care, Inc. and a Kentucky Business Organization
Plaintiff:
Saquoia Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
(PC) Grayson v. Sacramento County Main Jail et al
as 2:2023cv02859
Plaintiff:
Liguan S. Grayson, LiQuan S. Grayson and Ziquan S. Grayson
Defendant:
Sacramento County Main Jail, Trammell, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
