Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Lewis-Crawford v. Dropps et al
as 0:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Donald Lewis-Crawford
Defendant:
Brandy Dropps and Jennifer Shaft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
David J. Lewis
Defendant:
Warden Jared Rardin, Dr. Elaine York and A. Herzog
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. USA
as 0:2023cv02522
Petitioner:
Miles Denzel Raymond Lewis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hines v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bakambia v. Craane et al
as 0:2022cv02922
Plaintiff:
Marc Amouri Bakambia
Defendant:
Stephen Craane, Tim Walz, Luke Dehaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Eischen
as 0:2022cv01385
Petitioner:
Jamar Lewis
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aery v. Lewis et al
as 0:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
James Paul Aery
Defendant:
Deputy Nick Lewis, Unknown Deputies and Deputy Kyle Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canada v. Nelson et al
as 0:2021cv02388
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
Doug Nelson, T.K. Lewis and Rochester Police Station
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Sherburne County et al
as 0:2021cv02382
Plaintiff:
Otis Mays
Defendant:
Sherburne County Jail, The, Sherburne County, Elk River City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
