Cases 1 - 10 of 115
WEST v. D'ANGELO et al
as 1:2024cv04363
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. WEST, JR.
Defendant:
TPR J. D'ANGELO, DSFC G. WREN, DET II M. RIBCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. KUHN ESQ. et al
as 2:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM ALLEN
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN ESQ., PATRICIA MCGILL, MARC SIMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. MORRIS et al
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
TODD C. FORD, JR.
Defendant:
JOHN P. MORRIS, DET. I.C.J. PILIGNO, A. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
HARRISON LEWIS, III
Respondent:
STEPHANIE THOMPSON and RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DURHAM v. GANGI et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
ANTHONY GANGI, S. LEWIS, L. RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. MURPHY et al
as 1:2023cv23183
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JACKSON
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, VICTORIA KUHN, ALISHA LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv22677
Petitioner:
CEDRIC LEWIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BAASIT v. RUTGERS HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL et al
as 3:2023cv12384
Plaintiff:
JIHAD BAASIT
Defendant:
RUTGERS HEALTH AND BEHAVIORAL, RUTGERS, UC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2023cv12409
Plaintiff:
SHAWN LEWIS
Defendant:
CHARLES ELLIS, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTION CENTER and CUSTODY ADMINISTRATION CFG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILFORD v. KOPISTEKI et al
as 1:2023cv04461
Plaintiff:
LEWIS MILFORD
Defendant:
J. KOPISTEKI, NURSE HENSAN, ADMINISTRATOR MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
