Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lewis v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03851
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lewis and Tammy Lewis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Lewis v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 1:2013cv00508
Plaintiff:
Joan M. Lewis
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Scallop Shell Nursing & Rehabilitation et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services
as 1:2013cv00471
Plaintiff:
Scallop Shell Nursing & Rehabilitation
Defendant:
Lewis H. Gaffett
Thirdparty_defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disanto et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00317
Plaintiff:
Lisa J. Romeo Disanto and Lewis A. Disanto
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Town of Portsmouth v. Lewis et al
as 1:2013cv00267
Plaintiff:
Town of Portsmouth
Defendant:
Michael P. Lewis , RI Department of Transportation , Daniel J. Berman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Simpson v. Donahoe
as 1:2012cv00851
Plaintiff:
Lewis B. Simpson
Defendant:
Patrick R Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
