Cases 1 - 10 of 10
White et al v. Li et al
as 4:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Gregory White and Nevada Tate
Defendant:
Haoyong Li, Double Z Trucking, Inc. and MS Transverse Insurance Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
FMRI, Inc. v. Muskogee City-County Port Authority et al
as 6:2021cv00102
Defendant:
Sassoon Metals & Chemicals, Inc., Lewis & Peat (Metals), Inc., Samincorp, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
FMRI, Inc. and Fansteel Metals, Inc. f/k/a FMRI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Ali Abed Aldulaimi v. Department of Justice et al
as 5:2020cv00258
Plaintiff:
Salwan Ali Abed Aldulaimi
Defendant:
Shou Chung An, Department of Justice, Maryland State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paxman v. Li et al
as 5:2018cv00408
Plaintiff:
Jacob Lance Paxman
Defendant:
Jason Li , Queen Star Trucking and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv00370
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wald Ranch, LLC v. LI Group, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00454
Plaintiff:
Wald Ranch, LLC
Defendant:
LI Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Li v. University of Tulsa, The et al
as 4:2012cv00641
Plaintiff:
Ye Li
Defendant:
University of Tulsa, The, Winona Taketa and Rick Arrington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
An et al v. Napolitano et al
as 5:2009cv00124
Plaintiff:
Guangyu An, Li Kong and Di An
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Michael Aytes and David Roark
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lies v. Apex Surgical LLC
as 5:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Francis Joseph Lies and Francis Joseph Lies
Defendant:
Apex Surgical LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Li v. Gonzalez et al
as 5:2007cv00504
Plaintiff:
Xiaocui Li
Defendant:
Emilio T Gonzalez, Alberto R Gonzales and Michael Chertoff
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
