Cases 31 - 40 of 47
RIVERS et al v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv03417
Petitioner:
FREDERICK RIVERS
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH R. WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Washam v. Walsh et al
as 1:2012cv00931
Petitioner:
Thomas S Washam
Respondent:
James Walsh, Linda Kelly and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KEELING v. KELLY
as 2:2012cv02720
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant:
LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TORRES v. FOLINO et al
as 5:2012cv02545
Petitioner:
CARLOS TORRES
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY JAMES B. MARTIN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SATTAZAHN v. DUNHAM et al
as 5:2012cv02148
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALLEN SATTAZAHN
Defendant:
ROB DUNHAM, SAM ANGELL, ABBY RIGDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BICKELL et al
as 2:2012cv01179
Petitioner:
SYLVESTER SMITH
Respondent:
TABB BICKELL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SETH WILLIAMS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CLARK v. MAZURKIEWICZ et al
as 2:2012cv00213
Petitioner:
JULIUS J. CLARK
Respondent:
JOSEPH F. MAZURKIEWICZ and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PRICE v. CAMERON et al
as 2:2012cv00654
Petitioner:
CURTIS PRICE
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADLEPHIA, CO., SECRETARY AND BOARD OF AND PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2012cv00621
Petitioner:
JAMES JONES
Respondent:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, SETH WILLIAMS and LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REEVES v. HARLOW et al
as 3:2011cv00248
Petitioner:
ROBERT REEVES
Respondent:
MICHAEL W. HARLOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, LINDA KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
