Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Peter Tia v. Baker, et al
as 11-15689
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER RAY TIA
Defendant - Appellee:
BAKER, Lt., LINDA RIVERA, COSTA, A/CO and others
Tia v. Lt. Baker et al
as 1:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Lt. Baker, Linda Rivera, A/CO Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Rapozo v. Linda Lingle, et al
as 10-17146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD B. RAPOZO
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA LINGLE, Governor, State of Hawaii, CLAYTON FRANK, Director, Department of Public Safety and TOMMY JOHNSON
Rapozo v. Lingle et al
as 1:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard Borges Rapozo
Defendant:
Linda Lingle, Clayton Frank and Tammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ganotisi v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2010cv00042
Petitioner:
Rogelio Ganotisi
Respondent:
State of Hawaii and Linda Lingle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bell v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2009cv00529
Plaintiff:
William Michael Bell
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, Halawa Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tomel v. Ross et al
as 1:2009cv00489
Plaintiff:
Darlene Tomel
Defendant:
Dale Ross, Betsy Stuelke, Elizabeth Strance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richard Davis v. State of Hawaii, et al
as 09-16765
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD KAPELA DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII, LINDA LINGLE, in her individual and official capacity as Governor of the State of Hawaii, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE OF HAWAII and others
Williams v. Lingle et al
as 1:2009cv00276
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ken Williams
Defendant:
Linda Lingle, James Duke Aiona and Genshiro Kawamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dias v. Frank et al
as 2:2009cv01168
Plaintiff:
John Dias
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Tommy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
