Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Cowser v. Obama et al
as 1:2011cv00180
Plaintiff:
Janis Cowser
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Joe Bider, Thomas J. Vilsack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Tia v. Lt. Baker et al
as 1:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Lt. Baker, Linda Rivera, A/CO Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Ketchmark v. Obama et al
as 1:2010cv00725
Plaintiff:
T. Lee Ketchmark and Jehovah's & Jesus' Kingdom
Defendant:
Barack Obama, Linda Lingle, Mufi Hannemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rapozo v. Lingle et al
as 1:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
Richard Borges Rapozo
Defendant:
Linda Lingle, Clayton Frank and Tammy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Air Transport Association of America, Inc. v. Lingle et al
as 1:2010cv00444
Plaintiff:
Air Transport Association of America, Inc.
Defendant:
Linda Lingle and Sandra Lee Kunimoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Seto et al v. Thielen et al
as 1:2010cv00351
Plaintiff:
Muriel B. Seto , Friends of He'eia State Park , Hui Malama 'Aina O Laie and others
Defendant:
Laura Thielen, Linda Lingle, Daniel Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ganotisi v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2010cv00042
Petitioner:
Rogelio Ganotisi
Respondent:
State of Hawaii and Linda Lingle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
S. et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2009cv00569
Plaintiff:
A. S. and Brian Shaughnessy
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, Lilian Koller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
