Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Mast Enterprises, LLC et al v. Total Renal Care, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Defendant:
DaVita, Inc., Total Renal Care, Inc., Renal Life Link, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mast Enterprises, LLC and Star Plus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Link v. Daniel et al
as 2:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Alice E. Daniel and Akram N. Daniel
Plaintiff:
Trena Link
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glory Mark Hi-Tech (Holdings) Ltd. v. Asia-Link, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00030
Plaintiff:
Glory Mark Hi-Tech (Holdings) Ltd.
Defendant:
Asia-Link, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spillman v. Phoenix Financial Services, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv00375
Plaintiff:
Claudia Spillman
Defendant:
Phoenix Financial Services, LLC, Link Revenue Resources, LLC and John Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Consumer Defense, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Consumer Defense, LLC, Consumer Link, Inc., Prefered Law, PLLC and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
