Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kevin Dickens v. Taylor, et al
as 13-2533
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN L. DICKENS
Defendant - Appellee: STAN TAYLOR, RICHARD E. SEIFERT, ANTHONY RENDINA and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant: CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party: DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Ivan Mendez v. Jane Doe, et al
as 12-1656
Plaintiff - Appellant: IVAN L. MENDEZ
Defendant - Appellee: LISA M. MERSON
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg
as 12-1411
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Waples v. Danberg et al
as 1:2011cv00300
Plaintiff: Joshua Waples
Defendant: Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Spence Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Detlef Hartmann v. Thomas Carroll, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3069
Plaintiff - Appellant: DETLEF F. HARTMANN
Defendant - Appellee: THOMAS CARROLL, Warden, JOHN SCRANTON, STANLEY TAYLOR, Commissioner and others
James Biggins v. Jack Markell, et al
as 10-2940
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: JACK A. MARKELL, CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS C. CARROLL and others
Jesus Diaz v. Thomas Carroll
as 08-3665
Plaintiff - Appellant: JESUS DIAZ
Defendant - Appellee: CORR MED SER, LEE ANN DUNN, DEBBIE RODWELLER and others
Brian Francisco v. Corr Med Sys, et al
as 08-3446
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRIAN PAUL FRANCISCO, SR.
Defendant - Appellee: CORR MED SYS
Defendant - Non-Participating: THOMAS CARROLL and LISA M. MERSON
Defendant: FIRST CORR MED DE, KEVIN IVENS, MITCHELL KHO and others
James Biggins v. Ruth Minner, et al
as 08-2379
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee: DAVID PIERCE, JAMES WELSH and CORR MED SER
Defendant: RUTH ANN MINNER, CARL C. DANBERG, JOHN CARNEY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?